Find a Lawyer

FATEH DIN SHAH versus AHMAD KHAN

Section 6 and 13 questions regarding damages and jewelery for pre-arrest case In the present case the date of sale of the suit land was 21 7 1993 and the institution suit date was 5993. Both said the dates fell before the deduction 31 12 1993. By the Supreme Court, but as a result it was passed on 14-4 1998 when the provisions of section 6 (2) of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1991 that dealt with the avoidance of \ jewelery \ or ara harm She was no longer in power. To prove premature copyright as it is on three dates, the date of the sale, the date of filing and the plaintiff's claim of the injunction did not raise any evidence on the question of damages and jewelery, and that they were their former right of copyright. Failed to set up. Appellate order was canceled and trial court order was revoked on the date of sale of the case and the evidence of the source was necessary and evidence to avoid loss \ r \ n inheritance advocates near Chiniot lawyer