Find a Lawyer

MST. ALLAH RAKHI versus ASHIQ HUSSAIN

Section 42 sued the plaintiffs in their claim that they were the owners of the suit land, which was part of Shmilt Deh and appeared in Jamabandi in 1915. 1916 The defendants claimed that they were the owners of the suit land by the decision of the Tehsildar. Are. And the Civil Court Jamabandi Decree for the year 1915 1916 shows that it was in the interest of the plaintiffs that the occupants were in possession of the suit land, while in the interest of the defendants the occupation was occupied by the different Khasra number suit. This resulted in the dismissal of the courts below the closing. The contrary below was quite contrary and it was stated that misrepresentation of the documents, in view of the misrepresentation of evidence and unjustified dependence, it was clear that the lower courts had misdirected themselves and had exercised their jurisdiction over the material. Was used in conjunction with the rules and the impeachment order of the courts was set aside. Based on the available evidence, the plaintiffs were declared to be the owner of the ad-suit land top advocate from Digri lawyer