Find a Lawyer

ATTAULLAH KHAN versus HAJI ABDUL WAHID

Section 42 of the Societies Registration Act (XXI of 1860), section 17 suit, was dismissed by the trial court in connection with the management of a mosque and madrasa, but in the appeal of the plaintiffs it was decided that they were registered associations and after death Since the Imam of the mosque was operating the affairs of the mosque, he was entitled to manage the same dispute that after the death of the Imam, the affairs of the mosque were administered by the residents of the palace instead of the plaintiff. The plaintiff's statement that he was unaware of who was the imam of the mosque made it apparent that he was not involved in handling the affairs of association registration after the permission to register the mosque under section 17 of the Community Registration Act 1860. The mosque obtained by the plaintiffs was of no importance. The appellate court rejected the plaintiffs' case on the wrong ground that the issuance of electricity bills and Form PT1 was in the name of a plaintiff by the Property Tax Department, The fact is that the bills and forms were only in continuation of the recognized post that the imam who built the mosque in Masala He was the father of the said person (one of the plaintiffs) but that fact did not give the plaintiffs any right to administer the suit mosque, so, after that, the appeal decision was overturned and the High Court upheld the trial court. Restored. \ r \ n \ r \ n lawer from fb area from Kamalia Musa lawyer