Find a Lawyer

ALLAH BAKHSH versus HAIDER KHAN

Section 12 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Section 100 suits for the specific performance of a sale contract, upon the death of the original owner, the suit dispersed to the landlord, son and daughter of the original owner, both heirs of the original owner. There, the daughter created it. As a brother, his general attorney allowed him to sell his share in the suit land, which is 1/3 of his own, and the brother sold his share accordingly, disputing the dispute, however, revealed that the daughter's 1/3 part was separated in favor of the other person. Demanded specific performance for the sale of the contract and also altered the dispute that it was a claimant and claimed that the defendants' rights had been forged and that the sale agreement constituted four testimonies presented by the defendants. Has been proven through testimony and documentary evidence that supports the defendants' case. On that deal, the son was legally executed / proved on the attorney record, on this score, the decisions of the courts below were consistent, but the only issue was whether the daughter was one of the shopkeepers and she Was bound by a sale agreement. The said issue arises because his name was not specifically mentioned in the contract because there was a regular exhibit by the power of attorney under which the daughter appointed her brother. The attorney and gave him the option to sell his share of the suit to the land, and part of it was a sale agreement with the trial court for the entire suit, in which case it was justified that both the accused (brother) The whole suit was agreed to sell the land. And sister) below female advocates from Hub Chowki lawyer