Find a Lawyer

MST. ALLAH RAKHI versus MUHAMMAD SIAN

Section 42 of the Transfer Property Act (IV of 1882), the implementation of the declaration of gift in suits 122 and 123 claimed that he was the owner of the suit property and owned the property as a partner with the accused. He had brothers and the defendants were in the farming country, they continued to pay him the share of the produce until 1977, and he later refused to pay the share of the produce to his defendants that the plaintiff. The property is gifted in their favor The plaintiff denied any preparation. Gifted in favor of the defendants and insisted that he was the owner and in possession of the property in dispute because the trial partner's trial court dismissed the case on the basis that it was time-barred, but the following I appellate court set aside the trial court's ruling and order, and no one can present the defendant's decree in evidence, which confirms the alleged gift change, in favor of him, while the defendant excludes himself. Presented by two independent witnesses, who, in very clear terms, stated that the defendants had been contributing to the production of the land. And after that they stopped paying the share of the produce to the plaintiff claiming that he was the owner of the defendant / his brothers. Of the property in dispute and that the defendants continued to pay the share of the produce for him and the defendants could not prove in their favor the execution of the suit property gift which was passed by the appellate court on the basis of the evidence. And the order was in accordance with the law. Incorrect reading, non-reading, illegal, unauthorized, jurisdictional and material lawer from fb area from Hala lawyer