Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD versus MUHAMMAD HAYAT


Section 42 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 2120 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Authority's title of entitlement is not reflected in the Revenue Record Legal effect of misleading in the title of the property to which the party's legal right Will work on Whether or not anything else appears in the Revenue Record or creates a revenue record, or rather, it was merely intended to reflect the title otherwise acquired by someone else, there would be no mistake in the Revenue Record itself. The title will affect the title. The appellate court therefore erred on the ground that the plaintiff's head had not challenged the wrongful change within the time prescribed by Article 120 of the Limitation Act 1908, the decision of the appellate was declared unconstitutional and the trial court was restored. ?

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law websites from Rashidabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.