Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD versus MUHAMMAD HAYAT

Section 42 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 2120 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Authority's title of entitlement is not reflected in the Revenue Record Legal effect of misleading in the title of the property to which the party's legal right Will work on Whether or not anything else appears in the Revenue Record or creates a revenue record, or rather, it was merely intended to reflect the title otherwise acquired by someone else, there would be no mistake in the Revenue Record itself. The title will affect the title. The appellate court therefore erred on the ground that the plaintiff's head had not challenged the wrongful change within the time prescribed by Article 120 of the Limitation Act 1908, the decision of the appellate was declared unconstitutional and the trial court was restored. ? law firms from Kamber Ali Khan lawyer