ABDUL HANNAN versus MST. MAQSOOD ILLAHI
Section 5, Schedule and 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Appeal suit for restitution of marital rights Family Court pronounced the case, but the appellate court dismissed the same appellate court, which examined the evidence on file. After the investigation, the facts were discovered, which could not be shown by any false reading of false news and not reading the evidence that the lady had entered the marriage bond and the marriage was subsequently divorced by the woman. On the basis of the findings given by the appellate court in the jurisdiction of the law. In order to independently legalize and execute the applicant in the case, the High Court was not in the position that the same woman was living a second marriage. Which cannot be constrained by a decree restoring marital rights, which itself has been deliberately dissolved by the deliberate and active process of the appeal applicant. The court had adopted a valid view of the matter and the appellate court did not impose any fine which was not arbitrary or unreasonable, rejecting the decision of the constitutional petition.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Chakwal lawyer