NAZIR AHMAD versus HAJI NAZIR ALI
Section 2 and 14 Registration Act (XVI of 1908), arbitration 49 did not register the plaintiffs affected by the Section 49 damages award and their shops were not claimed for damages. The arbitration award could not be made the basis of the decree as it was not presented in the evidence and only photocopy of it was kept on record that the value of the award was more than Rs 100 and thus subject to compulsory registration. Unless such award was registered under section 49. The Registration Act, 1908, could not constitute a valid award for non-compliance with the provisions of the law, was invalid and could not be bound by the wrong award but the loss of the voluntary parties also had to be subjected to each one. There is no mention of it. The defendant's statement as a witness failed to prove the defendant's negligence as well as the plaintiff's claim for damages, failing to prove that the fire was caused by the negligence of the defendants and Nor was the trial court's findings overturned by the High Court in its exercise of jurisdiction over the claim that they suffered damages.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from FR Tank / DI Khan lawyer