Section 42 Title Proof of ownership is stated in the property of the plaintiff's grandfather, who is the daughter of the defendant's brother, claiming the 1/8th share of the property in which the defendant owned his father's property. Denied and claimed to be owned by a competing trial court in favor of the plaintiff in the plaintiff's suit, which the appellate court allowed on the basis that the plaintiff filed a document with his grandfather. Failure to prove ownership, the plaintiff's grandfather, having migrated from Jammu and Kashmir, had no title document in respect of the suit property. And the defendants also had no title document of the plaintiff's grandfather, and the death of their sons thereafter was based on their possession and ownership interest in the suit property. In his evidence, he said that the brother, rather he alone, was entitled to property in the dispute. The verdict and ruling brought by the appellate court was not correct and was set aside and the trial court's decision restored. Went to \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
