FAIZ AHMAD EX-CONSTABLE NO.2411 versus CAPITAL CITY POLICE OFFICER
R (B) (V) Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 444 of 2004), the appellant was dismissed from employment on the basis of intentionally absent from duty, the period of absence of the appellant concerned When the period of absenteeism was regulated by the same authority who approved the dismissal orders with no salary leave, the appellant was dismissed. A very ground was exhausted, the extinct orders were set aside and the appellant was reinstated. He stayed away from the job, which was supposed to be the right kind of leave
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Cherat lawyer
