SAGHIR-UD-DIN BABAR versus S.P. CITY DIVISION
R (B) (V) Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 44 of 44), after issuing show cause notice to the appellant and the appellant was dismissed, on the charge that he was absent from duty. Without obtaining permission and permission from the authorized authority, the authorized authority did not comment on the applicant's request for any leave and the appellant's hearing was not heard and the departmental authorities have conducted a series of personal hearings. I did not provide specific evidence about the service of the notice and other public letters. When applying for appellant's sentencing decision, appropriate consideration should have been given to applying for a ban on dismissal of appellant's sentence, to the extent that it was amended to reduce the time scale by one step The period of absence will be treacherous as a kind of leave
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Pindi Bhattian lawyer