Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAFIQ versus DEPUTY DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS DIVISIONAL OFFICE SUKKUR

Section 3 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Service Appellant was removed from employment on charges of gross misconduct, fraudulent commissions, and defamation of public income after issuing a notice for official reasons, Despite having no investigation against them. Denying serious allegations by the appellant, the regular inquiry against the appellant was terminated without any reason, the purpose of the preliminary investigation was to gather evidence and material and determine the truth of the allegations leveled against the employee. Only by the allegations made by the employee can they be convicted. Regular inquiries that were made after issuing a charge sheet to the authority, in this case did not feel the need to conduct regular investigations and penalties against the appellant but only a preliminary inquiry by the authority. Was banned from reporting only. Upon the dismissal of the appellant, the F cannot be preserved so that an Act Finding Inquiry can never be substituted for a regular inquiry and cannot be used against the Appellant for a substantial dismissal penalty, accepting the appeal, An unexpected order was set aside and after hearing the matter, the authorities were directed to restore the appellant. Take specific action against the appellant on the same allegations under specific charges \ r \ n \ r \ n property advocate from Patoki lawyer