ASHRAF KHAN versus CHAIRMAN PAKISTAN STEEL BIN QASIM, KARACHI
After the removal of the Section 3 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Appellant was removed from service and issued a show cause notice and charged with inquiry, which he allegedly removed. That he was employed by political influence Appointment of appellants was based on the recommendations of the selection / interview committee consisting of senior officers whose recommendations were approved by the competent authority. Could not be provided by the prosecutor in support of the inquiry officer / committee, was wrong, Swab Didi was and was not. The appellant had successfully completed his investigation on the basis of any evidence and his appointment had been disputed more than a decade later, which was not legally enforceable. Was used deliberately and dishonestly and negative order was already prepared, illegal and bad in law, invalid was ordered that the appellant was instructed that the appellant Get all the benefits from being employed in a job.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Jamrud Road lawyer