SARDAR ABID HUSSAIN versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD
Section 3 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Service Removal Applying the Audi Ultram Partium The public servant was not involved in the preliminary investigation and was not given the opportunity to cross-examine witnesses in the preliminary investigation, No show cause notice was issued to civil servants and after regular interrogation, government employees were removed from service under Section 3 of the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, to punish government employees Such a preliminary inquiry cannot be relied upon. Charges of fact by the public servant, the officials were responsible for regularly investigating the allegations of imposition of public servants under section 3 of the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance 2000, giving notice of the showcase after regular inspection. Had to be issued to impose a huge fine on the removal of the job because since the allegations were not formally investigated, there was no other showcase notice issued by the authorities against the public servant, even by the government employee. Was not personally heard from and thus violates the principles of Audi UltraPremium Or using their frivolous dismissal was ordered was condemned under which the service was restored and served the Tribunal allowed the appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Rohri lawyer