JAM MANZOOR HUSSAIN versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD
Section 152 (e) disqualifies all respondents, including appellants from various union councils and appellants who have been appointed vice-presidents, from the selection of the front of the disqualified and the deputy to the disqualification if they do not have the requisite educational qualifications. He said that because he did not have the required qualification for Matric Appellant, he claimed that the education system issued by the madrasa-Arabi had obtained the certificate, which according to the appellant was equivalent to MA, but it was not his own. Failed to name any article under study. What was literature was that the appellant could not even read the name of an article mentioned in the synod and Sanad had failed to translate the appellant's Arabic text but was said to be a farmer by profession, but he was not a court. Was unable to satisfy how he generated interest on 39. About two years after the prima facie appellant's maneuvering to achieve his religious education, the certificate presented to the Returning Officer to fulfill the qualifications assigned to contest the election of the Moderator and the Deputy. Otherwise, he never went to the institution for which the appellant had committed fraudulently for the purpose of fraud and intentionally used a fake document as genuine to appeal to such people For which the appellant was obliged to suppress the Intro Court appeal on the merit. Was not selected, accordingly it was excluded.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Kotli Loharan lawyer