Find a Lawyer

ABDUL MAJEED versus PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB

Public disturbance site plan approved by section 91 (2) Municipal Committee, the explicit value of unauthorized occupation of the public road to suit suit for purchase of suit land purchased by the video-registered cell deed plaintiff / applicant. The site plan was approved by the municipal committee, including the plaintiffs / defendants' area of the disputed land, and the approval of the site plan was challenged before the plaintiff's request. The plaintiffs / respondents of the plaintiff's municipal committee alleged that in fact, the plaintiffs / applicants had paved the way for public land through the trial court, under which both the suit appellate court accepted the plaintiff's appeal and the plaintiff's legitimate dispute was dismissed. The number was I was not involved in the execution of the sale deadline was the part of the public way in favor of the plaintiff by the municipal committee The approval of the site plan by the municipal committee, which included the controversial measles number, could not give rise to any accuracy or accuracy. Neither can it legitimize a claim of illegal possession or the claim of a plaintiff site plan. The municipal committee cannot be considered as a piece of evidence if it is approved by a competent authority for misrepresentation or master plan violations or for some reason, it may not provide any legal precedent. Nor can a person's personal rights be affected. The municipal committee approved the site plan after rejecting the first plan, had no legal authority, and no such order was required to cancel, without filing an appeal against the approval of the site plan, the plaintiff / The defendant filed a lawsuit to prevent the plaintiff / applicant from extending the construction solicitors from Pannu aqil lawyer