Find a Lawyer

S.M. ISMAIL versus CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, ISLAMABAD THROUGH CHAIRMAN

Section 49 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 99 Constitutional application for withdrawal of plots granted by the Capital Development Authority to the Staff Welfare Committee; To be excluded from After the lease expired, the issue of renewal of the lease was pending. The applicant alleged that such eviction was declared illegal because there was a plot earning committee which was a separate entity from the authority and thus such lease was outside the scope of the Capital Development Authority Ordinance, 1960. ? The Accreditation Committee was no stranger to authority, but did its constituent authority delegate some powers to the Committee so that it could tackle the project and use its funds for staff welfare purposes. The definition was that under political influence the authority would lease someone else's plot. Instructing the Committee to decide the fate of Lee's renewal, the Constitutional Appeal dealt freely within the specified time, and upon failure to do so, the Applicant will retain control of the Plot until its decision registration advocate from Khushab lawyer