Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AZEEM versus STATE

Article 426 of the Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302 (b) / 34, 337 A (ii) / 34, 337 F (i) / 34 & 337 F (ii) / 34 of the suspension has occurred. The accused was not liable for any injury at the moment, but only one injury was levied on the prosecution witness, which, according to medical evidence, was pursuant to Section 337A (ii), P.P.C. Came into the circle and that caused him pain. Sentenced to two years imprisonment, the accused did not repeat the injuries, the contrary responsibility of the other accused with the co-accused has not yet been decided, the future of the main appeal will be heard in the near future. Could not have happened, the accused's sentence had already passed. The prosecution, given to him for his individual actions, confirmed the injuries to the accused party during the incident, and that was not the case as the prosecutor described the accused as merely a punishment for jail bars. Could not be held back. Accordingly, his two real brothers were found guilty, as each had to account for his own actions. The punishment given to the accused was suspended under the circumstances and accordingly he was released on bail. had gone. patent advocate from Gari Mori lawyer