Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD BASHIR THROUGH HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES versus MUHAMMAD IQBAL

Section 8 Quanon Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 118 suit-occupying suit was dismissed, but the appeal was ruled out that the evidence of the suit-land ownership was disputed in favor of the plaintiff in the absence of proof. The claimant can not claim the property and claim that the claimant took up the construction on the underground land, which does not mean that he was the claimant or owner of the property, The confession was that he would be considered the owner of the suit property unless it is proved otherwise. The terms of Article 118 of the Connaught E, 1984, if the property in the dispute was actually a vacant property, the limberman could not be excluded from the same plaintiff, therefore, the appellate court is neither legally competent nor supports any evidence. Gain. On the one hand, the decision of the High Court and the order of the trial court were restored immigration advocates from Phoolnagar (Bhai Pheru) lawyer