ASIF MUSHTAQ versus DISTRICT JUDGE, RAWALPINDI
Section 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art 185 (3) Family Court, Restoration of Dowry Articles, Recovery of Dowry Articles and Recovery of Dowry Articles The current Court of Facts has the jurisdiction of the following courts: Decided in favor of decisions. And the orders passed by the Family Court, along with the Appellate Court as well as the High Court Plaintiffs raised by the husband, maintained that the amount of care was excessive and that the amount of Dwarf was waived by the wife. After recording of the case and going through the facts and circumstances of the present case, there was no compelling evidence other than the statement of the husband and could not be the same, with the evidence interfering with the decisions and orders of the Supreme Court. Denied. The leave to appeal by the courts below was denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Jehlum lawyer