ABU BAKAR SIDDIQUE versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, LAHORE
Sections 2 (p) and 181 exports / smuggling goods The option of fines for confiscation and confiscation of goods was not restricted under the policy of the jurisdiction of the Advertising Officer. Imports of personal goods were seized by customs authorities. Instead of confiscation, the judicial officer should have been given the option of smuggling goods without the payment of customs duty or taxes payable or deliberately or explicitly exporting goods or bringing them to Pakistan. No carry-out equipment. It was illegal to bring gold in personal goods in violation of the import policy of any sanctions or sanctions violated by the law, but not included in the list of specific items by the Central Board of Revenue for lack of a prohibited item. Was made, in which the option was made under section 181. The importation of gold could not be granted under the Import Policy, 1995/96, the Customs Act, 1969, was restricted to every registered son or any company whose purpose is to regulate its import and business in the local market but unregistered person. Its importation under section 181 of the Customs Act 1969 did not prevent customs officials from exercising arbitrary power, nor using the legislative word \ m. This section intends to give the customs authorities the absolute power to operate at their discretion; customs authorities must consider the provisions of section 181 of the Customs Act, 1969, which include the confiscation of cases. The order was approved. The provisions of this section may be summoned and the grantee may be liable for the return of goods in lieu of payment of fines and taxes.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
