Find a Lawyer

WATTAN PARTY THROUGH PRESIDENT versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH CABINET COMMITTEE OF PRIVATIZATION, ISLAMABAD

Privilege Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 153, 154, 184 (3) and 185 (3) under the Articles 184 (3) and 185 (3) of the Constitution under the Constitution Request for Attack on Wires of Privatization Commission Ordinance 2000 and The privatization of the Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation was declared valid, the Privatization Commission Ordinance, 2000 Constitution was not ultra-virus of the Supreme Court, while using judicial review powers it was observed that the mandate of Articles 153 and 154 of the Constitution , Is aware of establishment and working. The common interests were the cornerstone of the federal structure provided to protect the rights of the Council's federal unit. It said that the main body, which was not currently operating, and in view of the statement of a federal government lawyer who is in the process of making the council active, was directed to the federal government, to the extent possible. Work fast, but not later than six weeks; Approval for the privatization of Pakistan Steel Mill Corporation by the Commonwealth Council on 29 October 1997 continued to hold this sector, but the interventions were made by the Federal Government's counsel. In view of the controversial stance offered by the counsel. To the effect that the order of approval for the privatization was never remembered by the Council and the corporation's lawyer held that the issue of privatization was later dropped by ownership, if it If this is the case then it will be in order for the Commonwealth of Common interests to be referred to the Council. Generally, the Supreme Court, using judicial review powers, will not interfere with the executive's policymaking domain while the current case is subject to state-owned projects. immigration advocates email from Gilgit lawyer