Find a Lawyer

FAIZ MUHAMMAD versus ZAFAR AHMAD

Section 21 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act (IX of 1991), Section 35 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the Pre-Matter Suit Decree, 7 31 7 were passed before 1987, in which the Supreme Court in the case of Syed Kamal Had disconnected the given date. The PLD 1986 SC360 effect was passed on the initial decree 6 of 12 1982, and after the remand proceedings, the trial court dismissed the case and the lower appellate court allowed the appeal and the high court's validity docket dictum. Maintained. As submitted by the Supreme Court in the case of Syed Kamal as PMD 1986 SC 360, this order had no effect which was acknowledged in 6 12 1982, while the cut off date 31. 7 was 1987, which was concluded by the High Court. The Supreme Court was in accordance with the law on several occasions and did not guarantee interference. The appeal for appeal was banned for 24 days and therefore no reasonable justification was made for which Delays can be announced. Note that the court refused to interfere with the decision and the order passed by the High Court of Appeal was rejected \ r \ n \ r \ n Pakistan, top advocate family court from Bisham lawyer