Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SADIQ REPRESENTED BY MUHAMMAD SARWAR AND OTHERS versus AMIR MUHAMMAD

Section 8 Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), section 41 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article I85 (3) transfer of unknown owner, defendant's protection suit was on land which was dealt with by the accused to recover possession. Was filed by the defendants on which the defendants resisted on the ground that they had purchased the land. The trial court ruled in favor of the defendants, but the appellate court dismissed the case in which the High Court allowed a second appeal and decision, and the order passed by the trial court was reinstated. The defendants were that they purchased the land from the owner and were protected under Section 41 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1877. The apex court found that the findings of the High Court's concurrence with the inquiry into the trial Cortland question could not be discounted. The arid settlement is located in Deh and in these circumstances the High Court had to hold on to the fact that the session under discussion was with the plaintiffs until they were allegedly settled and in these circumstances the boundary. No one could be banned. The High Court rightly concluded that the prospectus was sufficient notice to the prospective buyer. Section 4 of the Transferred Property Act, 1877, especially when no evidence was presented by anyone regarding the proper action taken by an attorney in the title of a lawyer, as it was Before that same land was sold to the predecessor. The plaintiff Supreme Court refuses to interfere with the decision and dismisses the High Court for appeal. famous high court advocate from Dera Nawab Sahib lawyer