SAEED SULTAN versus PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION CORPORATION THROUGH CHAIRMAN, ISLAMABAD
Section4242 1990 1990 in in. Rehabilitation of the telephone line for disconnection of telephone line In the absence of maintenance of telephone connection in January 1993, the bill issuance in the absence of maintenance of telephone connection to the plaintiff to pay such amount of refusal. Will be responsible for failing to use the telephone after disconnection in the year 1990, failing to furnish record of telephone connection restoration, testimony of Assistant Engineer telephone statement between 1990 and 1993 by plaintiff and billing. The statement on was not paid by a customer; his telephone line was disconnected. If the plaintiff's telephone line had been restored in 1990 and the monthly bill was not paid, then her line would have been disconnected because after 1990 no money was paid by her. And the opportunity to issue a bill for such a large amount of money could not have been made had the plaintiff's case been decided in the circumstances \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Mehmood Kot lawyer