Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMADI SHOE MARKET THROUGH BILAL AHMED MIR versus SPECIAL OFFICER OF INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX


Based on Section 14 (2) and 17 Wealth Tax Rules, 1963, R8 (3) building annual annual letting value (GALV), the assessment of a tenant building was inspected by Assistant Commissioner Velidity Tribunal. However, it is recorded in the Assessment that the Assessing Officer did not provide any basis or reason for assessing the building at an unreasonable price, but failed to decide on the matter and had to examine the same duty of the Tribunal. Did the appellate authority and the Assessing Officer estimate the cost of the building, citing reasons for the parameters set out in R8 (3) of the Wealth Tax Rules 1963, the High Court remanding the tribunal for its latest decision in accordance with law. Received

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocate from Dinga lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.