Find a Lawyer

FAIZ BUX versus MUHAMMAD SADIQ

A IX, Rr 9, 13 and O XVII, R 2 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for the same reason dismiss the default fresh case in respect of the same property Ex parte order to keep the ex parte Penn's decree was accepted, but due to the proceedings the absence was dismissed and the suit was again withheld on appeal. The question was whether the fresh suit was wrongly imposed by the appellate court, the suit was dismissed under OIX, R9, CPC was at that stage when the trial court recently When no evidence was filed in the case, it was claimed for the purpose of the judgment that the only cases to be avoided in the case were considered whether the case should have been dismissed or not. The reason was for failure to disclose or because of this lawsuit. The trial court could not exclude a new case or refuse a subsequent trial under any provision of the law, so the trial court erred or disqualified without committing any crime. criminal advocate from Battagram lawyer