Find a Lawyer

MIRZA MUSHTAQ AHMED versus MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN

Article 199 was filed almost ten months after the dismissal, with petition for condolences pending the dismissal on the dismissal of the constitutional application, in which the petitioner requested that the Additional District Judge be appointed. The lawyer appointed by the indicator did not appear in court, which resulted in his constitutional application as a law-abiding lawyer appointed by the dismissed applicants as Additional District Judge in March 2002. The case was settled on 19 7 2004, as Additional District Judge. LA over the appointment and the date had already been removed from the default period. The dismissal of the constitutional petition was approximately 2 years and five months when the petitioner appeared in person on 18 4 2001 when the matter was partially heard and his hearing adjourned until 19 7 2004. The applicant took no interest in this matter and did not participate. While his counsel's office engaged a lawyer to find out the status of his constitutional plea, the parties were not relieving of the responsibility of examining the progress of their case; And did not follow the request and did not even know about the appointment of his lawyer. As the Additional District Judge, no reason was given for the delay in filing the reinstatement and the reason stated by them was very ambiguous and no evidence was supported, no basis for the delay and the restoration of the constitutional petition. Not made, maintenance requests registration advocate from Swabi lawyer