Find a Lawyer

ARSHAD ALI versus MUHAMMAD TUFAIL

Section 11 The race will act as a judiciary after judicata, object theory and applicable judgment or ruling, directly and clearly deciding a particular issue, and its trial in subsequent proceedings between the same parties. Ban it. In the event of a previous attack or defense, but it was not done, then such a case will be considered as constructive and it has been decided that in order to avoid the majority of litigation and finalization. The purpose of the doctrine is to maintain the end rule. In each subsequent case between the same parties, the decision on the default points / matters and thus the legality of the termination rules.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• Syed FARHAT GHAUS GILANI v. JUSTICE OF PEACE, RAJANPUR 2013 MLD 629
• SADAQAT ALI v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE/JUSTICE OF PEACE, GUJRANWALA 2013 PCrLJ 630
• Syed TAHIR HUSSAIN SHAH v. Syed SAEED ANWAR 2013 CLD 630
• CMH TRADERS v. CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER 2013 PLD 631
• CARETEX v. COLLECTOR SALES TAX AND FEDERAL EXCISE 2013 PLD 634
• SAGHIR CO. through Proprietor v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary 2013 PTD 636
• NADEEM alias DINA v. State 2013 YLR 638
• GHULAM MUSTAFA WASEEM through Bashir Ahmed v. State 2013 PLD 643

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

pakistani advocates Guddu lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes