Section 302/34 Qatl e amd Appreciating the evidence There was no previous rivalry between the parties. Reported this. On the complainant's entirety; and he made statements even during the trial, the source of information about these circumstances, in those circumstances, could not be said to have been present, both of the prosecution's witnesses, Of course, the accused was related, but the accused was also related to them. And in the absence of any previous hostility between the parties, especially because their presence was natural, it was stated that the prosecution's witnesses could not be denied injury and death, as well as between death and post-mortem. Medical evidence consistent with the time of the incident confirmed the prosecution's case and there was no contradiction or contradiction in which alleged pistols were used in a working order by a ballistic expert and shot. The body of the deceased was thrown out because of It was believed in these circumstances that the weapon used in the commission of the crime was a firearm, there was no error in proving the prosecution's case against the accused beyond doubt, in which case there was no mitigation. In the absence, the accused was justified in the death sentence. , Under the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
