Find a Lawyer

JAVED IQBAL AWAN versus ZARA1 TARAQIATI BANK LTD.

Rr 3, 4 (1) (b) (i) and 5 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), applicable to the penalty of reduction by a phase in the Section 4 scale, on their own scale for a period Decrease by one step. The appellant was given a two-year ban after taking notice and questioning him against some allegations of incompetence, negligence and corruption. The inquiry report failed to show when witnesses were examined in the investigation and when and where their statements were located. The recorded appellant was treated unfairly in his defense of the circumstances when he was not given the opportunity to examine the witnesses. The truth of the allegations against the appellant could not have been established without giving him a fair opportunity to examine the witnesses presented by the authorities against him. Done, the appellant could not be prosecuted based on a one-sided inquiry. De Novo provides the appellant with a full and fair chance of cross-examining the witnesses and prosecuting the allegations and allowing them to defend themselves. famous supreme court advocate from Khuzdar lawyer