Find a Lawyer

SANAULLAH ABBASI versus ALI ANWAR

Testimony of witnesses under Sections 561A, 202 and 355 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 427, 506 (2), 451, 342, 220, 119, 147 and 149 of 515 complaints, through the PC The recorded magistrate himself made the statement and at the end of the statements no footnote was written by the magistrate's reader or clerk under his dictation, the magistrate seems to have taken the matter very lightly. And has dealt with the usual task of preliminary investigation. The magistrate thus violated the provisions of Section 355, CRPC Reason, which the complainant, who was a Town Police Officer, had disputed with other persons on the same route as wagons. Do not appeal the argument that the applicant / officer of a higher office shall personally interfere in the dispute of such dispute unless it is brought on record to provide evidence that his Has a relationship with either of these two parties. ; Or that he had done something wrong with the party in dealing with some of the previous scores which he had called upon him, to allow such proceedings to be continued, in the circumstances the misuse of law enforcement. Would be equivalent to, in the situation best law firms from Swat lawyer