Find a Lawyer

MESSRS FACTO BELARUS TRACTORS LIMITED KARACHI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF INDUSTRIES, PRODUCTION AND SPECIAL INITIATIVES

Article 199 Constitution Petition Once a judicial review administrative decision was made, the zero tariff petitioner was rejected but the respondents were once allowed by the authorities to import the tractors. The applicant had submitted that the order of the authorities was not transparent and was personal. The invitation to import agricultural tractors launched by full commercial advertising, beyond arbitration and jurisdiction, as well as interest-based pricing, was not in accordance with the decision of the Economic Coordination Committee. The whole process was lacking in transparency. And it was subjected to a personal decision, along with arbitration and jurisdiction over the rights, a detailed scheme consisting of implementation methods for the proper implementation of the Committee of Economic Coordination Committee Committee set up by the High Court of Economic Coordination. Instructed to produce, as well as quality The eight were also presented. Steps were to be made to develop protective valves for the purpose of providing tractors to farmers at reasonable prices and to prevent misuse of the scheme. The High Court further instructed the authorities that after formulating the detailed scheme, the parameters, conditions, requirements, time limit and other necessary directions, they should advertise the scheme and send proposals and then send such companies / investors to the tractors. The recommendation to allocate imports, which were found to be competent and highly competent High Courts in the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction, terminated all proceedings. best law firm from Samma Satta lawyer