ABAN versus STATE
Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 342, 415, 452, 147, and 149 offenses against property (Enforcement Hood) ordinance (VI 1979), section 17 (3) guarantees, grant of further investigation. The accused did not transfer to the FIR and the nominees in the FIR were released by the police on the basis of further statement lodged by the complainant under Section 62, CRPC where the complainant stated that It involved the nominees by mistake. At night, the complainant's house, which saw eight suspects in the bulb light and named four persons in the FIR, could not be identified, but no request to release the four named accused in the FIR recovery. Was not done Made from the accused, but the recovered articles could not be complained to the complainant. Only three accused were identified after the arrest of the accused cannot be denied. For further investigation into the accused, he was entitled to bail. \ R \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Rawalpindi lawyer