Find a Lawyer

MIR HASSAN versus STATE

Section 497 (2) Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), SS: 11 and 16 bail, Grant of Further Inquiry Council for the accused claimed that the accused was a liar and that he I was involved. The backdrop of hostility and suspicion; that the 12-day unclear explanation for the FIR was delayed. Although it has been alleged that Wardet was present at the scene, no prosecution was attributed to the accused. That the statements of witnesses were recorded under Section 161, CRPC, approximately seven days after their appearance and that the dispute was contained in the ocular version, medical evidence and statement of the alleged abductor under section 64 under64, The CRPC lawyer had made the prosecution's case very skeptical. And one of the further investigations and he was able to produce a bail case, which allowed it. best advocate from Saidu Sharif lawyer