Find a Lawyer

IMTIAZ AHMED AND OTHERS versus PUNJAB PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION THROUGH SECRETARY, LAHORE

R7 (1) (22) Punjab Government Notification SOR III (S&GAD) 2 17/83 (P1) Date 30 2004 2004 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Applicant, Existing In this case, he was a graduate and qualified for the LLB exam from 1999 to 2004. During this period, no conditions were laid for two years of experience as practicing Advocate for Applicant / Civil positions to attend Punjab Public Service Commission Competitive Examination for the posts of Public Civil Judges cum Judicial Magistrates. Were able to compete for. The Judge Comm Judicial Magistrate, presently and competing in the competitive examination, but after two years' unsuccessful status as an advocate, the active process was introduced by amending Rule 7 (I) (II) of the Punjab Judicial Service Rules. Was. In 1994, when applicants failed in their first attempt, the applicant's opinion was two years - as an advocate was introduced, resulting in applicants / civil judges unable to attend competitive exams for lesser positions. Were. Judicial magistrates inter, on the basis of which the notification of the suspension has been introduced cannot be applied retro. Notification was not really practicable in specific impact accuracy, in practice, or in the form of subordinate legislation, but in the present case, the previous application of anonymous notification was not included for the simple reason that requests were made at this time by the Public Service Commission. Applicants were sought through public notice Applicants were not eligible for two years of required experience of active process in law and conditions of eligibility to qualify their case advocate from Kotli lawyer