Find a Lawyer

MAQBOOL AHMAD versus PAKISTAN AGRICULTURAL

Article 129 (g) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) Dismissal of the available evidence Assuming the official employee the final result of the fact through a forum below acknowledged his responsibility to harm the government in a letter Of such employees were dismissed from the service The penal services imposed by the service tribunal were retained. The civil servant did not attach a copy of the letter in which he accepted the written obligation. It was sufficient that the contents of the letter regarding the entry of civil servant were considered correct and the law against it could not be allowed under the provisions of this testimony. It may be deduced, the 1984 Inquiry Officer found the public employee guilty after proper appreciation of the record, which was later approved by all forums that did not require him to act. According to the evidence presented by the judges authorized by the service tribunal supported by the Court of Appeal for the re-examination of the evidence filed by the Inquiry Officer charges against the public servant, the Government's employees were compliant with any of the prescribed rules of the Supreme Court. Failure to identify evidence whereby the Supreme Court can convince that the search presented by all service tribunals against it was illegal, illegal or against the records of the authorities' current actions and service tribunals. The decision was deemed unimaginable in this case by any law of public importance Although the question was not included, the leave to appeal was denied patent advocate from Mohen Jo Daro lawyer