Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus STATE

Article 10 (3) Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Increased response to the evidence of Arts 187, 203 DD and 203F (2B) evidence Victim, a minor girl of 12/13 years, forcibly attached to her house Was taken to the garden and targeted. The trial court acquitted both the accused from the view of committing adultery for sexual assault of an innocent girl by the two accused, but the Federal Shariat Court pronounced the verdict and sentenced the accused to seven years in prison. In the light of evidence of unrecognizable role in the form of a Medical Legal Report and a Chemical Examiner's report, the examination of the testimony of the victim and the four witnesses is justified, except for evidence found by the Federal Shariat Court in the appeal. Will not produce the result. Reaching through the trial court was based on minor contradictions and contradictions, therefore, the conclusion drawn was the result of a misinterpretation of evidence in detecting evidence of a felony conviction in criminal cases as irrational and perverse. The Shariah Court re-examined the evidence and found it appropriate in the appeal that the decision passed by the Federal Shariat Court did not demand any interference by the Federal Shariat Court of the Supreme Court. If convicted of a crime under Section 10 (3) of the Adultery of the Crime (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979, he sentenced everyone to seven years in prison without giving any reason, so that sentence was justified. Terminate the Supreme Court justice in exercise of powers under Article 187 of the Constitution, in the interest of full justice, the conviction of the accused has been refused to appeal from seven years to fourteen years. lawer from fb area from Dijkot lawyer