Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SALEEM versus STATE

In depth investigation of section 302 (b) criminal code of conduct (v. 1898), section 426 (1), the accused was convicted and sentenced under section 302 (b), p. He was sentenced to life imprisonment for causing a deadly blow under the PC. The deceased High Court, after scrutinizing the evidence, had suspended the plea of the accused taken by the complainant that the High Court had suspended the sentence and examined the evidence deeply, which prejudiced the prosecution's case, Unless the evidence shows that the trial court's finding was in violation of the facts on record, any other view of the evidence is merely the possibility of suspending the sentence under section 262626 (1), CRPC. And one, there would be no reasonable and reasonable basis for guaranteeing life imprisonment. Their appeal against the conviction on the capital capital charge is deferred. The difference between a temporary assessment and a deep evaluation of the evidence and the rules was that the appellate court, based on the reasons for filing a lawsuit, suspended the conviction. And to grant bail to an offender but on the basis of a deep evaluation of the evidence, the exercise of the power to grant bail through suspension was against the principle of use of force under section 2626 (1). ), The CCP Appellate Court should not go into the depth of evidence for the purpose of suspension of the sentence, and may give reasons for expressing your views about the purpose of the suspension of the sentence, which may be attributed to one or the other party in the appeal. The case was cleared, calling it biased. Under section 262626 (1), the CCP granted leave to appeal for immunity for misuse of discretion. immigration advocates from Hassan Abdal lawyer