SHAKEEL AHMED versus PAKISTAN STEEL MILLS CORPORATION
Appeal of Service Tribunal Appellant to avail of voluntary premature retirement service from Section 13 Medical Tribunal Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Medical-based service, although fully fit and healthy in health, Medical Ground But the premature retirement application was made and he was retired from the job and was paid his due and was dismissed from the department. Appellant alleged that his retirement was not voluntary, but he was forced to accept it because of rumors of a retirement and downsizing in a department spread by the Employment Corporation. And the accuracy of the corporation was naughty on the appellant's part, he voluntarily applied for medical-based retirement, and after being examined by such a standing medical board, he was comprised of senior medical officers. The appellant had never challenged or objected to it. Medical Report and Voluntary Retirement Benefits Not Happily Accepted The record was on evidence to show that the appellant had in any way accepted his custom retirement and did not say It is likely that the appellant was retired by corruption or the appellant never refused to relocate after his retirement remained silent. Withdrew his retirement and requested reinstatement a year after retirement, and after voluntary retirement transactions became a thing past, the appellant had no fundamental right to re-serve and the appellant did not disclose. Under whom does he serve?
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
