Find a Lawyer

LIAQUAT MUHAMMAD AND OTHERS versus MESSRS HASHMI CAN COMPANY LTD. AND OTHERS

Section O11 An Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII 1969), S, 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Employees' Establishment Retention Claims Company Receives Order of Retention from Labor Court, Employees With Labor Department The matter was exacerbated by the inspection of the factory on the instruction of the Minister. And in the video post it is concluded that the company has a ton of manufacturing department working with the strength of 150 worker petitioners, in the circumstances before the Labor Court, the application under Section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance was preferred and the Labor Court order. Was able to obtain a retribution order against. The company filed an appeal before the High Court primarily on the basis of which the letter being relied upon was not admissible as its original version was not presented and that its photograph It is not enough to relieve the applicants of the statute, while the defendants agree with the arguments. The Labor Department's controversial letter of Labor Court legality relied on by the applicants whose original document was acceptable and the High Court was not allowed to refuse to accept it if the said letter was in fact doubtful. So he could have referred the matter to the Labor Court. Taking evidence from Lee's directorate, saying that "prove the fact of Lee", the High Court could have decided the case on merit instead of accepting applicants on the technical ground, after the Supreme Court upheld the contents of the letter. Remanded to, Unknown decision set aside after changing request for leave. Appeal to appeal immigration advocates from Shangla lawyer