Find a Lawyer

MST. FARAH NAZ versus JUDGE FAMILY COURT, SAHIWAL

Section 5 Recovery of Past Restitution Sworn overseas Pakistan's embassy certified unauthorized wife filed a retrieval case against her husband, who is recovering past Rs. 10,000 per month, The Family Court relies on the husband's affidavit, through the contents of the embassy and the written statement confirming the verdict, dismissed the decision of the case, and the family court's order was upheld by the appellate court and The trial was partially granted, however, the High Court ruled in the constitutional jurisdiction and Restored com name The cost of the wife's claimant's recovery is neither excessive nor unreasonable, leading to inflation in prices and the amount of potential income earned by the claim of the wife's husband under justice and the cause. The decisions of the two courts by all the courts, as well as the superior, were valid. The court found the misinterpretation of the record and the material misstatement of the evidence to be a serious error of law which led to the gross abortion of justice. In fact, the written statement cannot be considered as an alternative to the evidence on oath. The husband's affidavit certified by the embassy will not constitute legal evidence as he did not appear before the Family Court husband in his cross examination. At no point did I try to appear before the appellate court but I rejected this version of the wife, therefore, it would be considered legitimate and lawful for all intents and purposes, especially in this case. I disagree with the High Court ask a advocate free from FR Peshawar / Kohat lawyer