Find a Lawyer

SYED MUSHTAQ HUSSAIN SHAH versus ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY (APPELLATE AUTHORITY), GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, S&GA DEPARTMENT, PUNJAB,

R6 (1) (b) Local Councils (Accounts) Rules, 1981, R10 (4) Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 appeals to the time scale with a three-step reduction in fines. Done. The three-step reduction was imposed on the appellant, who was serving as an accountant, alleging that the Town Committee was charged with negligence in carrying out its duties. Was. Deposit to TC accounts whereby the accused officer managed to seize the amount mentioned under the provisions of R 10 (4) of the Local Councils (Accounts) Rules 1981, obtaining the receipt book and ensuring its appeal. The last responsibility of the contributor is. The revenue received went to the department's account, but the appellant failed to do so, as a result of negligence, however, according to the Punjab, the appellant was not imposed. The Local Council Service (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1990, because R6 (b) states that one of the major penalties is at the lower level of the rank or time scale or at a lower stage in the time scale. There was a shortage, while the authority had the time scale imposed a penalty of three stages on the Order of Authority, to the extent that it was illegal. The penalties imposed on the appellant were restricted to a lower stage in a time scale and the provisions of the Civil Service Rules (Punjab) would be banned; with this amendment the year, the appeal was dismissed. list of advocates from Kamokey lawyer