SYED AFTAB AHMAD BUKHARI versus ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY/CHAIRMAN, APPELLATE COMMITTEE, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNAB, SERVICES AND GENE
In the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 of the Rail Appeal Penalty, the appellant was accused of lacking time / 3 stages at the time level and inquired for lack of supervision. Will be The corporation suffered a great loss due to the alleged negligence and the negligence of the appellant as the allegations against the appellant were proved, the appellate court did not take any illegal action, according to the department authority. The approved impedance order was, however, retained under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Jauharabad lawyer