Find a Lawyer

NAZIR AHMAD ABBASI AND ANOTHER versus EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE), BAHAWALNAGAR

Section 3 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 appeals against Patwari Light and Gurdwara respectively, was denied charge sheet and misconduct against them, in violation of their official powers. He was dismissed after an inquiry into the allegations of use. And the tampering with the record allegations against the appellant was that he and his co-accused, Deputy Tehsildar, illegally and transferring agricultural appreciation to the co-accused / Deputy Tehsildar's half brothers, filed a charge sheet under Punjab Civil Servants. Was released. After the (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1999, the Authority said that the inquiry should be considered a preliminary inquiry and that the Punjab Removal Service (Special Powers) inquiry officer of the Ordinance 2000 misused the appellant, including the co-accused Deputy Tehsildar, after the inquiry. Have been charged. The tampering with governmental powers and records and thus deservin g rigorous sentencing inquiry reports were considered by the authorities and the appellants were given the opportunity of a personal hearing and their defense was considered and the Speaking Order of the appellant and co. The accused Deputy Tehsildar was dismissed from the job, the appellant was fully proved that he had acted dishonestly and his accompanying clear intention is that he was once a Civil Punjab Civil Servant (qualification). And discipline) was ordered to be executed under the Rules, 1999, the Authority has since the service (special powers) Now remove the left to be able to order an inquiry in Punjab, because according to the law, the authority granted by any Order famous high court advocate from Sheikhupura lawyer