Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NASEER versus DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL

R 26, Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Retirement Preparation for Retirement Preparation, Cancellation of Appellant for Service Tribunal Appellant, who has received more than 25 years of service qualification for pension. , Applied for the LPR in which the Appellant was approved. His application for LPR indicated the reason for his retirement that he could not continue his job because of domestic circumstances, Appellant filed an application to cancel the LPR just one week later. Which stated that they can continue in service when they have become domestic conditions. The applicant's request for cancellation of the LPR was eventually rejected by the respondent authority, using the option of the LPR, with full responsibility and with the utmost caution, as instructed by the Government employees. Had the right to That's why a government employee was there. Requires an application at least three months before its original date on which it intends to proceed to the LPR or the applicant's second request for cancellation of the retirement LPR found a clear contradiction. Because domestic circumstances that forced him to retire, change cannot be expected within just one week. Appellant had no rights under the terms and conditions of service. Withdrawal from the LPR or Revised Leave Rule 1981, you were not given the right to enter into duty before the expiration of the leave authority granted by the civil servant, in the circumstances in which he The options were given accordingly top advocates from Shemier lawyer