Find a Lawyer

AFTAB IQBAL versus EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER (EDU) NAROWAL

Section 7 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Seniority Appeal to Service Tribunal Appellant who joined the Education Department at place N joined place 4 N \ 17 4 In 1993, 6 2001, the appellant was transferred again in 2001. The order of the `` video \ 'to hold 10 L \' s was issued on 10 10 2002 and it was stated in the transfer order that it was specifically mentioned that his seniority was given the seniority of his cadre in the respective district. The list will be placed after the appellant was adjusted to the place in the school in accordance with the order dated `13 2002 2002. In the year 2004 the applications were sought for absorption as In SST as and Applicant was ignored because on his transfer to L \ L on N \ he was placed at the bottom of the seniority list in his own cadre appellant, claiming that his The seniority was to be prepared according to the date of enrollment in the Department of Education, which was valid on the Appellant in 4 1993. The service period was to be calculated on the basis of pension when the appellant was transferred from place `L from 'so it was properly placed in the bottom of the sanitary in his cadre as specifically in the transfer order. Was mentioned was r \ n \ r \ n law firms from Kohat lawyer