MUHAMMAD ISMAIL versus STATE
The accused, along with Kalashnikov, was caught red-handed on the charges of appreciating the evidence in Articles 302 (b), 394 and 324, while the presence of eyewitnesses could not be suspected at the time of the incident as they were also shot. There were incidents of escape. The incident was recovered from Kalashnikov's possession, where blood-stained articles were recovered from a chemical examiner's report, prosecutors' witnesses identified the suspect, medical evidence also confirmed the prosecutor's story, Aini The witnesses were independent witnesses and had no motive to make false allegations of the accused in the crime.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Talamba lawyer
