Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AYUB versus STATE

The main purpose of Section 342 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII VI of 1979), Sections 10 (3) and Section 342 of 182, the implications of the CR PC Examination Non-Examination Chemical Examiner's report, although it is regularly prosecuted Heard. And it was held by the trial court to record the conviction against the accused, but, the record was silent - according to his statement recorded under section 342, CRPC compliance with section 342, CRPC. The same thing was said in the front or not. , According to its terms, was compulsory and then leave was not valid, if under prejudice under section 342, if any prejudice was disclosed, the CCP was compulsory and not arbitrary if The trial court finds that any circumstance that it is possible to produce evidence against the accused is the cause of his conviction, then the court will not be able to hold him at this point without questioning him. The defendant's invention was to provide him with an opportunity to explain the circumstances, which could harm him or affect the mind of the judge when a conclusion was reached. The investigation of the accused was not merely a formality, but the decision of the adjudicator was decided by the trial court and the process of recording the proper and legal statement of the accused under Section 342, CR PC. Only the remand of the case was obtained. re r \ n online advocate from Dina lawyer