Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

NOSHAD versus STATE


Section 7 377 Penalty (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (1979 VII of 1979, 1979), conviction of section 12 evidence, lack of prosecution was able to prove its case against the accused beyond the scope of any doubt, The complainant was unable to disclose himself, with the complaining party still having no explanation as to why the complaining party falsely implicated the accused in this case when it was proved by the testimony of his father and other prosecutors. The medical evidence presented, the alibi-infected cop's position taken by the accused, has been confirmed. The trial court was not convincing, in the circumstances the accused was properly sentenced, however there was a commissioner, who was less than 20 years of age at the time and his co-accused had already been dealt with by the High Court. What was, to maintain the conviction of the accused in both cases, the sentences were reduced from 10 years to 3/2 years, from 000 to 15,000 according to \ r \ n \ r \ n

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Matli lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.